"Explosions in Vitebsk repeated. In 2005, the city also had a tin can, which was laid a bomb. But of the examination revealed that she was an industrial way. Spoke about this lawyer Stanislav Abrazei at the court" - Lyubov Kovaleva said, a mother of executed for alleged acts of terrorism in Minsk and Vitebsk Vladislav Kovalev.

According to Lyubov Kovaleva, for that for that earlier people were shot, now draw on "hooliganism": "Now the same thing happens. Officials said that there was a pyrotechnic composition. Our guys shot for a similar composition. They blamed their set as 'explosive'. And the current explosion was qualified as 'hooligan'. "

The explosion in Vitebsk mother shot Vladislav Kovalev connects to the economic problems in the country: "This is not the first explosion in recent years. Unclear to whom and why. As they say, people want bread and circuses. If no bread - give people sight. This against the background of the economic crisis. I think it's to do with politics and the economy. "

Meanwhile ERB compared explosions in Vitebsk - disclosed previously and committed now, "'The bomb was placed and camouflaged in metal jar drink 0.33 l' - it's not about the explosion in Vitebsk, near the KGB building 11 November 2012 . This is the verdict of the court in the case of an explosion in Vitebsk September 14, 2005. "

Device that exploded in Vitebsk on 14 and 22 September 2005, were similar to one parameter - disguised as drinks: 0.33 liter tin in the first and beer cans 0.5 liters in the second. And here is the official information about the explosion November 11, 2012 from the website KGB "cardboard or plastic tube packed with 50-70 grams of pyrotechnic mixture and placed in a jar with a capacity of 0.25-0.33 liters without damaging elements. In action is a way to fire (through burning). " As for the explosion opened a criminal case under Article 339 of the Criminal Code (hooliganism). Similarly qualified first explosions in 2005, and later retrained in terrorism.

Unit in 2005 was triggered by a wick or other unknown actuator. The phrase "other unspecified execution unit" - is from the final charges Konovalov and Kovalev. The device, which happened around Vitebsk KGB different devices in 2005 that did not have a damaging elements.

Evening, September 23, 2005 the KGB has reported that the suspects were detained. A week later, Lukashenko said that "in Vitebsk two blockheads blown simulation device and thought that they would be found. They quickly figured, found, and they are told where they took the powder and they wanted to scare people into the ground." It was about the brothers Murashka, which after six months of detention in prison was released. And as a result of an explosion attributed Konovalov, detained nearly six years.

By Charter’ 97, Euroradio, udf.by