Maria Svetlova-Lebedeva - the invalid of the second group for the hearing and visually impaired. Nevertheless, it is almost twenty-seven years of uninterrupted service in the same enterprise. But not about the professional activities of women will be discussed further. Call us citizen prompted entirely different circumstances.
Nearly six years ago, the guardianship on the ground that the mother cannot fully exercise their parental responsibilities, took the family to the orphanage Snezhana daughter and younger son Nikita. All this time, the parents tried to return the children, but always in the way of family reunification rose some obstacles.
Maria, share their vision of the problem.
At a time when the family took away our children, and that was in 2010, my ailments included in the list of those diseases in which parents are unable to fulfill their parental responsibilities. I think that one of the reasons for taking care department of the decision was the fact that a little earlier, I myself asked to put in a boarding school of my eldest son, with whom she could not cope. With younger children as I have no conflict was not: they are intelligent and obedient children. I note that they took me without deprivation of parental rights. Someone, however, and in the workplace, and in the custody department of spreading rumors that I was deprived of parental rights.
Children placed in Viciebsk children's home, where I visited them regularly. However, less than six months, as a younger son was separated from her sister and mother were sent to Brasłaŭ district, a boarding school for mentally retarded children to the half-brother, with whom he was not familiar. I wrote on this subject in different institutions, but did not anyone listen to me, saying that everything is done according to the law. Getting to the hotel was difficult to Brasłaŭ, and you will not go empty-handed. I could not visit them because of financial problems. After two years the younger son moved to Biahomel boarding school.
On maintenance of children from the total amount of wages and pensions I regularly was calculated to 75 percent. One time I even deprived of pensions, while the second group, which has deprived me nobody is considered broken, according to the law I have the right to work only on a dedicated enterprise.
You told me once that you still managed to get children back to the family, then what was the reason for their re-placement in special institutions?
In 2014, father of Snezhana and Nikita confirmed his paternity, and he returned the child. Before that I was considered a single mother. Despite the fact that children are returned, the guardianship is strictly forbidden me to visit my children. The reason for repeated removal of children from the family was the fact that on the anniversary of his father's death, my husband drank a little. guardianship bodies found him drunk and took not only children, but also deprived him on that basis of their parental rights. Snezhana again taken to the Viciebsk children's home, Nikita again hit the Biahomel. The eldest son at the time had already come of age, and studied at the Lyceum. Children were separated again.
Almost six years have you been trying to get the children back to the family, how things are going at the moment?
Now Snezhana 16 years, she was going to college. Son is 12, and his is still in Biahomel. On the eve of New Year's greatest desire was to return the children to the family, to my mother. Snezhana wants to go home, he refused to live in a dormitory. I am very worried about the psycho-emotional state of the children. However, the judge was inexorable: it stated that "according to the court, accommodation of children in the family is inappropriate". The daughter was hysterical. The younger son stutters badly. At trial, a psychologist, it was stated that the child must be in the family. It is a home boy. However, neither the conclusion of the psychologist, nor a desire to court the children did not take into account. They saw only the negative.
We put a lot of effort to get children back to the family. For the sake of my husband and I changed apartments. He was my oldest son lives in my apartment, where we cannot afford to make the necessary repairs, and I was with my daughter and younger son had intended to live in his apartment, where living conditions better. But I was told that these conditions are not normal to stay children. It has everything: beds and a table for sessions, television, home library, a fridge is always filled with products.
It helps the brother, who is visually impaired. It is in the past - a graphic designer. Together with him we made a cupboard, a room and a hallway full-stick. But this is not a guardianship suit. For them, perhaps, and renovation will be bad, but the conditions in which the child lived in a dormitory, no better.
In addition, we have tried to fulfill other requirements of the guardianship: written application for the restoration of the parent-child relationship, the husband was coded, but the doctor told him that we should not do it, but we asked in the hope of the return of children. Now, the coding used as a fact that prevents the return of children.
There was another interesting point: while the daughter took me without deprivation of parental rights, it was included in the lists of those children who are looking for a new family. Is it normal?
Contacting the media was for Mary Yurievna last hope for the return of children to the family.
S. Horki
