The main argument in favor of the accused women is the lack of a clear motive for the crime . Thus Vitebsk human rights activist Paul Levinov commented guilty plea suspected of committing a blast near the KGB building in Vitebsk.
"In this case, do not understand the motive of the crime. I wanted this woman to prove blast and annoy her than the KGB? It is known that she was judged , but it is unlikely to judge the KGB. In this case, it should have been offended by the prosecutor's office to the police, which his illegal actions caused her suffering, " - said the human rights activist.
He said that from the beginning ambivalent about the story: "After all, look carefully, as it turns out. On the explosion in the Minsk metro we were also trying to say that these guys have long earned it : blown glass in the library , in the entrance , too, something blew up , and all this kind of training. Nevertheless, no preparatory actions of the woman we had never heard of. The fact that something exploded somewhere , we do not know. And now they say that she was getting ready before doing something . But why this was not known ? And maybe this is it implemented those explosions in Vitebsk , which hung on these two guys? "- Continued by Paul Levinov. He noted that even Dmitry Konovalov the preliminary investigation has claimed the bombings in Vitebsk.
" And on the criminal records of people to police , the investigating authorities , prosecutor's office and the KGB easier and easier to influence their force . I find it hard to believe that the explosion has made this woman . Since almost one year . But if we look back , we remember that this was a time when someone was again dissatisfied with the KGB , and he had to swim up and glow. So I do not rule out the possibility that it was a provocation , carried out the very same power, " - said the human rights activist.
He added that the locals have always resented the fact that in a park near the building is always lit lanterns and caused them inconvenience . " However, one week before the explosion, they were extinguished, and was just pitch black , which was made explosion. Therefore, these small details suggest the vague doubts . Moreover, that all is shrouded in mystery , and there is almost no information. We had to do everything openly : to publish documents to be interviewed is not generic, and specific phrases to disappear every reason to doubt something . But, as in the case of Andrei Gaidukova , and in case of an explosion near the KGB , nothing is clear. Therefore, there are various conjectures and suspicions , "- said in conclusion Paul Levinov.
Recall accused of the bombing at the KGB building in Vitebsk, pleaded guilty in court.
Charter ‘97
