For several months the tenants 58 entrance №2, on the Pravda street can not achieve justice.

The fact is that in August-September 2015 in the entrance were repaired. However, in addition, that the invoiced cost does not correspond to the work executed, residents literally had to pester, to them gave relevant documents, as the estimate and contract, which, by law, had to be compiled and presented at the very beginning. Violations of many, and all this, to say the least, has outraged residents of the second entrance.

Let's start from the beginning. The fact that in the entrance of the repair will be carried out, it was announced at a meeting of the residents July 24, 2015. To attend, not all tenants, as It was Friday night, and many simply do not see an ad, because it was posted on the same day, ie shortly before the meeting.

The meeting came to the signature of residents gathered his wife, the chairman of the cooperative Tishutina A.G. (Chairman of the cooperative – Tishutin A.S.). That wife was engaged later works of repair and signed some documents, such as a certificate of value of work performed and the costs of acceptance report of completion of construction and other special installation work. An important point: whether the right had Tishutina A.G. engage in cooperative affairs without proper authorization (which probably is, but the residents do not know about it)? It turns out, according to the response ZHRET Oktyabrsky district, which was given in February 2016, the inhabitants of the protocol meeting of 24 August last year, a resident of the second entrance Tishutina A.G. It has been selected as an authorized person from customers on acceptance of executed works that, in turn, gave her the right to sign the documents mentioned above. An important point: where the minutes of the meeting and who attended it?

Even despite the fact that at the initial meeting in July, attended by very few people, re-residents are not collected. Those. a detailed discussion of the repair was not, then the preliminary estimate was not too represented. However, once it stipulated that the amount of repair parts will be included in the payment of municipal services. Important point: Why was not originally presented preliminary estimates? And why the contract presented to tenants in February, although the tenants were originally made such a request?

Many residents, since it is not present at the meeting learned about the cost of repairs much later, and she did not cheered. Another interesting fact is that the signatures collected with the other tenants employee housing department-9 Oktyabrsky district. Perhaps, in our time, this is considered normal.

The cost of repairs, just to say rather big. At the meeting it was presented the following amounts: a 2-room apartment – 1 million rubles, 4-room – 1.5 million. The house has ten floors, four apartments on the site. Such a sum is huge for decoration, and not everyone has that kind of money. After someone receives 10 million, while others only 3, maybe less. At the meeting it was noted that would paint the walls, ceilings, windows, railings, garbage disposal, battery, elevator.

Due to the lack of documentation and a great amount claimed disagree with the situation the tenants began to search for the truth.

Originally collective applications (letter) in the executive committee and the executive committee. Answers two instances are almost identical. For example, in the Executive Committee's response, that the estimated cost of repairing the porch, designed with the nationwide materials price is 37,166,660 rubles. The sum of the average cost of one apartment, as specified, – 929,166 rubles. Moreover, it is noted that with the estimate of the residents entrance can be found in the housing department-9, ie, this suggests that the estimates are.

But when the tenants turned into this housing department to the then Acting Chief Yakovenko G.V. with a request to get acquainted with the contract and initial estimates, they were told that if necessary, they will make it.

In the autumn with grief in half after numerous calls and visits to the housing department occupants still provide a certificate on the cost of the work performed and costs, as well as the act of acceptance. An important point: every page of these documents is not the date and number of the signed contract, the name and position. It mentions only one name – Tishutina A.G.

After completing the repair a new calculation with the cost of actually spent material was compiled – 29,702,777 rubles.

Answers of the executive committee of residents was not satisfied, and they appealed to the State Control Committee in the Viciebsk region. A SCC was promising. It was noted that the appeal forwarded to the Viciebsk Oblast Executive Committee. That is, it turns out again in the same river. From the response of the regional executive committee is nothing new tenants do not know. It is worth noting that in the answer (30 December 2015) states that the defects interior trim removed. Probably defect it is called that paint with painted walls began to crumble almost immediately.

This outraged the quality of work performed by the tenants have not stopped and turned to ZHRET Oktyabrsky district in the hope that they will understand in this matter. ZHRET (February 5, 2016) From a formal response can be found, that is, the contract really is signed and it was August 24, 2015. An important point: why is it presented to tenants in February, with a copy? Why contract without numbers? And why, when residents went to a reception at ZHRET in January 2016 and were also asked to produce an agreement, they said that they are not supposed to?

They say residents of the house 58, they do not mind repairs, vice versa. But what has been done today, does not correspond to the presented to the payment of the cost. The estimate report stated that paints spent more than 280 kg, but in the course of repair were not painted windows, stair railings, battery. In some places, they even fall off plaster and paint. And for such repairs to pay that kind of money? repair turns "Gold".

We do not agree with the tenants and the act of acceptance, for example, those of its terms, such as: water-based coloring compositions walls previously painted with latex paint, old paint with clearing up to 35%; Oil painting compositions previously painted metal surfaces, etc.

Moreover, those apartments that do not want to pay, used what is called a sort of method of soft threats. For example, the apartment defaulters sent out warnings that their electricity will be turned off. An important point: under the relevant decision of the Council of Ministers, turn off the light can only with debt to pay for utilities, and the fee for basic utility services – is maintenance, maintenance, overhaul, public services (this includes the power supply).

In all this history is too much uncertainty. But the main question, of course, two. Quality repairs – again, the cost of repairs – two. Walking along the chain of command tenants entrance №2 is not brought significant changes. Nevertheless, they are not going to stop, as it is now – a question of justice.