In connection with the proposed changes in pension legislation, our correspondent asked residents of Viciebsk region show their relevance to the topic, which affects everyone who has plans to eventually become a pensioner.

Elvira, 41 years, works. My friends approaching retirement age – the people of the old school. We, those who are now in the region of forty years, that do not have health, they do. The ecological situation in the country after the Chernobyl disaster can not but affect the health of the common man. At the age of close to sixty, we will not be able to do their work as efficiently as they do. We – both the generation ...

On the specifics of my job I have to pay extra for harm, but we do not get anything. Even milk – and then do not give as before. It is already today work hard, we have people wear out quickly. And how long we will continue to work on this? To finalize before retirement, we seek only those who left a couple of years. Many go to work as hard.

Among my friends – all against the new pension reform. But people are silent, no one will protest. Silent because they are already trained, "Something I do not like – go away. You are no one holds. "Here's an example: a single mother, trying to find a mutual understanding with the captain, said: "Put yourself in my position, I am a single mother of a child." – "And it is necessary so that you are not one brought up."

We have to keep silent, because the worst thing in our circumstances – losing their jobs. So much so, that the production or the more political issues with each other colleagues have already almost do not discuss. Scarecrow: What if someone will give instructions. Everything is quiet, everything hush-hush.

One can only scoff at him: the time comes, I will serve the population with a stick, as the fifty-eight as a young man, not run. A high unemployment losing their jobs due to their non-competitive professional is a breeze. And now tell me how I can relate to the new rules yield well-deserved rest?

Leonid, 45 years old, a driver. In the face of the current regime in Belarus to carry out a full pension reform is impossible in principle. Therefore, half-measures taken by the authorities to the Belarusian society will bring only harm. A terrible harm.

What is done hastily – without public debate, without regard to medical research, without debate in Parliament – can not be good. The mere fact that this issue is resolved in haste presidential decree – is nonsense. Where is the discussion? Where is the scientific analysis of the effects of the reform, which takes place in conditions of dire economic and systemic crisis? What kind of reform we can speak at all?

Mark my words. As a result, thousands of people, who will be 60 years old, will be on the street, just for 3-5 years before retirement, as employers in the first place oriented to the young and middle-aged professionals. And that these poor fellows will do? What will be forced to pay for their parasitism?

Today I am burying a man who in 55 years has died. What kind of reform we can say when people do not live to retirement? First of all it is necessary to change the existing regime is anti-human. It was only after two or three years after the change will be in the parliament to consider the issue. Instead, the current increase in the retirement age simply finish off the last human hope for the existence of a fair social state. Will kapets full.

They say, "Life expectancy is increasing." Let go at the city cemetery in the Copts and see how much there is of young people. Here we are just buried thirty Man. He worked in Moscow, fell ill, have not taken to the hospital, burned for two days. Brought buried. What might be the pension reform? People are in bondage, people shamelessly destroyed ... I live among ordinary people – so I know what they breathe. To raise the retirement age'm unequivocally negative. We are two months salary not paid, there is nothing to pay. Why live? A boss said: "I do not like it – leave in Muscovy."

A friend told me a policeman. He went into one family, sees – the food on the table, said: "Well done, cooked porridge." And the hosts in response: "What a mess? According to a hundred thousand on the farm was given, that feed steamed milk. " A family. How to live?

What reform as they head into the noose put in forty years? Pension reform will be for many a terrible moral blow. Where is the moral suffering – there is a cemetery! And there is no way, people do not see the output. The dark night came over Belarus. Europe is the regime in toy play, and he is ready for the loan of their people to drive in the grave.

Ales, 59 years old, does not work. If the state in which we live, in fact, civilized and socially oriented, and it is mandatory for fifteen – twenty years of work experience? Even if a person did not work and the hours, he should receive the minimum social pension. If the state is not able to provide the citizens of that minimum, then why is the state? You never know what the reasons were a person – not to work? Different there are people different opportunities, different circumstances ...

The State, by definition, has no right to deprive a person of the social pension. Not able to – go, there are people who provide these minimum social guarantees. Our man of literacy understands and agrees with the state voluntarism.

Everything that happens in our country the past two years – is a complete profanation. How can I calculate a fair pension without taking into account the fact that many of the people living in different states, two different monetary systems? This should also speak.

At present, any Belarusian pensioners should receive a minimum of one hundred dollars. Below this boundary can not be lowered, and then let people think – they are for the country and run. "It is not the people for the government, and the government for the people!" – A classic. If the classics do not know what are you doing there?

If I have enough experience, then I should receive a pension that was enough for me to pay for public services and still have to something to eat and get dressed. The rest I do not care. Let cares state. If the state does not care, why do I need such a state? There is also an objective subsistence minimum below which they are not entitled to lower pension. All! This is the basis of civilized attitude of the state towards its citizens. I do not care on their five – ten – twenty years of work experience. Such nonsense could come up with people from the plow, not able to run the state ...

So what comes out? If I have 15 years, and it is necessary 20: I, a bum? Okay, but pay me for 15 years. Bollocks something. I worked as a chief specialist on the farm, at the senior veterinary office worked for two years. Such salaries received. He worked as chief technologist ... And now I'm homeless? I served two years in the army for five years – at the university. How was it possible to select an army? I do not understand! It is a crime! This humiliation of civil dignity. Like, still gobble! Seven years away ...

Do I willingly went into the army? For three years I took care of her sick mother, did not work, but did not take her to the social public institution. And the years will not be taken into account when calculating pensions? Fascism some! I round the clock could not move away from the sick person. In general, do you have the soul of the people who come up with new rules for pension accrual?

Alexander, 54 years, cares for his sick mother. You have to understand that raising the retirement age, the government at the expense of the impoverishment of ordinary Belarusians save the economy. Yes, people are outraged, but do not go with posters and letters do not write in the ministry. But above all, striking cynicism and arrogance of power. By excluding from the army seniority and years of training in high school, they are deprived of people from 2 to 7 years of experience.

I'm not a lawyer, but a basic legal illiteracy would not have allowed ever. According to their logic goes that forty years ago, a man had to be aware of their current initiative. But I then nobody warned, and I could not anticipate that the current government will be so cynical it is necessary to make fun of me. On the contrary, even then I thought that in my work experience includes years of training, you need to go after school to work. And having worked only a year, he entered the University.

So, before you cancel the old rules had to say today's issue of the schools that the army and training pensionable into account one will not take from a certain year. Then, today's graduates can, look, is there any point in teaching.

Actually, who govern us? What is the government? What are these MPs? What are they doing? This natural mockery! And if the state eliminates the army, then the citizen should have the right to say: "My good will – go to serve, or not." Is not lawlessness?

Not with this you need to start, when the economy is in crisis.

S. Horki