How is it that today a woman and her three children, two of whom are nursing, and one is seriously ill, registered at 367.5 m², but can neither fall under its own roof, or to issue a loan to build a new one?
Full cup: country house near a pine forest, which is now estimated at $ 250,000, own tea business, postgraduate studies in cardiology, several vehicles, a reliable husband – so began the history of 43-year-old mother of many children Irina Belkina from Viciebsk. Action-continuation of the story, which she sent to the editor Gorod212.by, could take one or two page encyclopedia of crime. After all, in it the love boat is broken not only life, but also 11 years of carefully planned fraud under the auspices of the notorious people. More than 6 years in court the Viciebsk resident have to fight for their property and to receive a formal replies. A former lover and his family refuse to give them the once decorated cottage in the village Baroniki.
"From the materials of the criminal case becomes obvious that Sasha had hidden under a covering of the trunk of my car radio, containing precious metals, and then told the KGB, where they should look. He knew that I have to cross the Belarusian-Lithuanian border. However, the prosecutor refused unreasonably consider these facts. Of course, that's when I thought Gluhmanchuk his family and to satisfy an oral agreement on the future renewal of the purchased property for me. Once in the house I discovered the recorder with the records, where the former was trying to ask me provocative questions. As you can see, my property seizure was planned, and in this war, he prepared seriously. All this was done with the active participation of his mother, Valentina Petrovna", – says Irina.
Failure of the Prosecutor's Office of Viciebsk region from 10.23.2014 to initiate criminal proceedings against Gluhmanchuk A.A.
"In 2007, we formalized the marriage. After all, from that moment I began to raise questions about their property rights, but the answer is not found. At this time, the ex-husband was waiting for me to invest in the final accomplishment of the house. Not feeling the impact, and at least some help, after three years, I filed for divorce. Appeal to the court of Viciebsk region with a request to annul the sales contract lawsuit forced me Gluhmanchuk and Baranoks my child with eviction. Sasha called me two days before the scheduled regular meeting and said that the decision has already been made in his favor at the level of the regional court. You know what happened. The district, regional courts have refused me. From template answer came from the Supreme Court of insufficient evidence. It seems that as a loyal attitude towards it on the part of these structures due to the fact that his godfather is former Mayor Fedorchuk N.A., which has repeatedly solved his problem in my eyes. For protection from the corrupt government, I asked the editor of the investigative journalism and criminal chronicle of the newspaper "Respublika" Leonid Yunchik in the guardianship authorities, as well as in the Department of Health of the Viciebsk Oblast Executive Committee. Thanks to the protection of their son and remained registered in Baroniki, but without property rights. Then Gluhmanchuk tried to evict us for at least the rights of tenants in his two-bedroom apartment in a residential area. But it received the conclusion about the impossibility of the child's resettlement in connection with the infringement of the housing rights, possible deterioration of health and mental state ", – says Irina.
On consideration of the appeal by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus of 11.08.2014 on the decision of the court of Viciebsk region refuse to claim Gluhmanchuk AA, Baranok I.A., Baranok N.P., Handel V.E. to invalidate the part in the agreement of purchase and sale of land and located on it a residential building, recognition of ownership of home ownership (Belkina I.V.) at Viciebsk, st. Aksakov, 17
Excerpts from the minutes of the July 7, 2010 preliminary hearing, the evidence that the man not only ascribes to himself the purchase of the house and carelessly refers to Irene, but also denied their civil period, repeated trips to the sea, the protection of:
"Fedorchuk actually my godfather, but it was during the Soviet era. Now he is retired and does not interfere with my business.
I met at that time, not only to her but to other women. But live, I did not live with her, and no economy we did not. I was not going with her to register the marriage.
I actually went with Belkina once to Lithuania to buy homes. This was a business trip. I drove to her simply as a driver."
In the family circle. The extreme right – Irina Belkina, her son Maxim and Alexander Gluhmanchuk
Leisure at sea. Irina Belkina and Aleksandr Gluhmanchuk
Leisure at sea. Irina Belkina, her son and a son of Alexander Gluhmanchuk from his first marriage
Leisure at sea. Alexander Gluhmanchuk and Irina Belkina's son
"As a family Baranok, they are in the disputed house never lived, utilities and land tax is not paid. At the trial, gave contradictory testimony, and in the majority of the responses were limited to the phrase "I do not know", "I do not remember", – says Irina. – Moreover, they have publicly stated, if I Gluhmanchukom contract, the claim will not be home. Baranok Nicholas said he did not need this shelter, Irina asked her these things do not interfere. Then Baranok changed evidence and have come to believe that this house them, and they bought it."
A fragment of the preliminary hearing of protocol 07.10.2010
Irina Belkina: "Check the tax inspection showed that neither my ex-husband or his relatives at the time of purchase, the house did not have the means to acquire them. Each of them allegedly paid to 10 000 $. Sasha worked as a laboratory of the regional hospital, Nikolai Baranok who abuse alcohol and repeatedly dismiss the driver, lived dependent Irina Baranok. According to the testimony of Handel Seller home the money he paid only me, but on the eve of trial Gluhmanchuk offered him a certain sum of perjury.
Sasha Gluhmanchuk, reporting their income, provided a copy of the receipt IMNS stepfather Loan rubles for the purchase of third homes. Nikolai Baranok tradition in his confused explanations. To justify the $ 2000 received from the sisters of the "given" to her house on the words he had to bury his mother two months later, real life, but for $ 2,500 to make of her that lime worker of the farm, kopivshuyu dollars at a time when they were not on sale . Baranok Irina Arnoldovna working in the marketing department of JSC "Viciebsk Bakery", referred to a decent salary, but calculations showed inconsistencies of its income and expenditure.
Again, the court did not give proper assessment of the testimony of a neighbor to testify Baranoks and chairman of the horticultural cooperative "Seagull" Porahonko IA And she confirmed that in 10 years, the couple barely finish the existing house, not to mention the purchase of another."
Answer Inspectorate of the Ministry of Taxes and Duties of the Republic of Pervomaisky district of Viciebsk on 10.05.2011 on request during the audit and compliance with the law declaring income and property of citizens: Gluhmanchukom A.A., Baranok I.A., Baranok N.P.
"At the end of September this year, the application was forwarded to the Investigative Committee of Viciebsk on newly discovered evidence in accordance with Chapter 22, Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Belarus "of evidence". The subject of proof is the transfer of money under the contract, confirm the presence of the source of funds, the financial failure of the defendants for the purchase of the disputed property. These facts are essential for the proper resolution of the civil case. Somehow forgotten presidential decree of the Republic of Belarus for mothers and children, and the rights are trampled and Irina nullified" – summed up the mediator, legal advisor class 1 Valery Budkevich.
Alexandra Hodyukova, gorod212.by
Photo from the personal archive of Irina Belkina
