The court refused primal Belarusian Independent Trade Union (BNP) workers "Naftan" in meeting the requirements for the city executive committee to reverse the decision to cancel the registration of the supplementary agreement signed with the independent union.

Novopolotsk City Council first register and then annulled the registration of the additional agreements with BNP primary organization of accession to the collective agreement "Naftan". This came after complaints Belkhimprofsoyuz. There sure that supplementary agreement had to agree with them.

The independent trade union sued the City Council, putting the only requirement: to cancel the cancellation of registration of the supplementary agreement. At a hearing on June 18 the judge refused Rimsa independent trade union in the request.

- The situation is amazing: the employer believes that we are right, we believe that we are right. But the judge still ruled, based on the fact that we have not asked for permission from the branch union. Although in any document is not spelled out. Nonsense! - The chairman of BNP primary organization of workers "Naftan" Ivan Svyatokho. - At the hearing the representatives of the executive committee stood their ground. Apparently, admit his mistake for them would be a shame. Judged young guy - and he apparently did not dare to go against the executive committee. His decision does not make him honor, to begin his career with this ... it will affect the reputation.

The independent trade union intends to appeal to the regional court.

- I do not think there will be on our side. But just leave this thing is impossible, it is something unusual. If the decision is negative, we will not stop, - said Ivan Svyatokho.

The leader of the independent trade union "Naftan" also drew attention to the uncomfortable position in which to put the employer.

- The employer said clearly: even if an additional agreement is not registered in the executive committee, it works. But the fact of cancellation of registration ... This disrespect not only for the union, they insulted the employer. I am even more sorry for him. The employer agreed (CEO did not just signed a supplementary agreement means were all legal grounds), the city council passed the paper, and he puts it below the level that says that the employer acted incorrectly. Employer nor set at naught, - said Ivan Svyatokho.

praca-by.info