First Deputy of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus Valery Kalinkovich refused to consider the appeal of the Viciebsk doctor Igor Postnov due to the fact that in circulation, according to the judge, there are offensive words and expressions.

Indeed, in the Law of the Republic of Belarus "On citizens and legal entities," it states that a written appeal may be left without consideration on the merits, if it allowed the use of obscene or offensive words or expressions. In other words, the legislator has granted the exclusive right to persons who by their competence, are obliged to consider appeals of citizens and organizations, on their own, without any examination, to determine whether there is in the appeals obscene or offensive words and expressions.

This possibility is very convenient for bosses and managers, as it gives them an opportunity to reply to the questions posed to the applicant, to which they do not want to be responsible for political, economic or other reasons. And what words obscene, any abusive, degrading their honor, dignity and business reputation – they are free to choose for yourself.

And the case with Dr. Postnov which Kalinkovich judge actually denied in correspondence due to the fact that he had made a few harsh words and phrases in your e-mail message to the Supreme Court, is typical.

For clarity, let me give you a few quotations from the letter of Mr. Postnov which provoked a negative reaction on the part of the deputy chairman of the Armed Forces.

"Sukala's justice – this is when a judge gets an orgasm, mocking defendant that seems all that he junked. Sukala's justice has become synonymous as "Stolypin's necktie", "tight rein"."

Or: "The essence of Sukala's justice in that it ordered. Open registered. In Russia it is corrupt."

And again: "As long as there Sukala's justice, elections will not be. Open violence against the innocent on a call. It's worse than venality. This complete slavery. Noble pregnant dogs (bitches – "suki" popularly called), has nothing to do with it."

Historically, all the laurels and disgrace popular rumor attributes the immediate supervisor of the state or other prominent personalities, in which were carried out the conversion in the State or in any department. For example: "Stolypin's land reform", "Stalin's Constitution", "Brezhnev's stagnation" or "Gorbachev's perestroika".

The current Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus Valentin Sukala is in this position is the irremovable 19 years. Thus, Valentin Olegovich can without exaggeration be considered the architect and builder of the independent judicial system in Belarus. Therefore, Dr. Postnov and uses the phrase "Sukala's justice", in order to tie the Chairman of the Armed Forces name they built the country's judicial system. But what is a system, whether it meets the standards and modern requirements for the administration of justice – to assess citizens, including Igor Postnov.

One must admit that Dr. Postnov in his message boldly, but under the current legislation, gave a negative assessment of the judiciary at all levels, public doubts as handed down by the courts decisions. And as a citizen of his country, he has that right, and it should be noted that the right uses more often than anyone else.

And how the courts in Viciebsk – Mr. Igor knows firsthand. Once he has experienced all the delights of the existing judicial system, which sent him to be treated for the alleged aggravation of his mental illness. Therefore, it is not surprising that the doctor uses harsh words and phrases, trying in this way to bring the whole unacceptable for him to practice adjudication in the district and regional courts of Chief Court of the country. However, he called the Belarusian courts "Sukala's" it in any way does not seek to offend them by this expression.

And not to face the judge of the Supreme Court Valery Kalinkovich so vehemently defend the current legal system in which it is one of the main leaders and which is responsible for the quality of the Belarusian courts.

Moreover, criticism and assessment of courts and judges activity, sometimes severe, is part of the work of the court clerk, and the criticism have to learn how to react, and not hide behind the fact that "the written appeal may be left without consideration on the merits, if in treatment allowed the use of obscene or offensive words or expressions."

It is possible to insult a person or officer, but the judicial system of the country it is impossible to offend.

Lyavon Efremenko