Teacher of Beshenkovichi, poet and bard George Stankevich wanted to challenge the decision of the district court. April 3 he was fined seven and a half million rubles ( 50 basic units ) for the manufacture and distribution of the newspaper " Kryvіnka ", which is published on the own funds of the founder.
Consideration of his complaint took place in Vitebsk regional court on May 7. However Stankevich himself could not come, and the judge refused to consider Svetlana Ivanova his complaint publicly, despite the fact that the hall was attended by supporters of George Stankevich and Vitebsk defenders.
Regional Court's decision that the complaint is not satisfied with George Stankevich, he received just now. Of mail- decision makes it clear that the Regional Court found no procedural violations during the trial of the founder and publisher of " Kryvinka ", and did not notice infringement George Stankevich.
" So it is written : " procedural violations that could lead to the cancellation of the judgment, it is not revealed. " And the fact that it was conducted without a lawyer because the judge refused to wait Natalia Reut defender of Minsk, which I trust to protect their interests written at all clear that the " Certificate of violation of the right to protection has not found confirmation " because I supposedly " left the meeting without the permission of the judge." Where is the logic? judge herself told me to leave the room - after I repeatedly expressed petition that, during the Ming attends a lawyer with whom have already agreed and not representative of the district attorney 's office, where I sent the judge. also I petitioned to the court called for an interpreter, since I do not know Russian language enough to understand all the legal aspects. However, I refused and this " - says the resulting resolution George Stankevich.
Removed from the courtroom publisher " Kryvinka " the prosecutor's office filed a complaint against the judge Natalia Reut. The prosecutor promised to give a written response, and intervene in the case did not immediately considered necessary. Was written and the second complaint to the president of the court. Meanwhile, the judge has completed the process. The result was a penalty under Part 2 of Article 22.9 of the Administrative Code for violation of the publication and distribution of " Kryvinka."
Court on such charges was already the third for George Stankevich. The first administrative case against him and " Kryvinka " began in 2010. Then runs the court and a fine of 20 basic units. Following penalty in 2012 was already twice as much - 40 base units. Prior court decisions also failed to appeal to the regional court and in the higher courts. complaint about George Stankevich charges in 2010 is pending before the UN Human Rights Committee.
spring96.org
