Vitebsk social activist Peter Ivanov asked the competent authorities to initiate criminal proceedings against the judge Valentina Kismeroshkinoy, which, in his opinion, knowingly violated the law and unjustly punished him with a fine of $ 4 million rubles in the administrative case. However, it seems to attract criminal liability may not judge, but of Peter Ivanov about this to the head of the Investigative Committee of the Vitebsk region, Vladimir Shelukhina asked the chairman of Pershamajski district of Vitebsk A.A. Andrushenko.

"As for the Ivanov's statement a criminal complaint filed in USC, the analysis of its contents ... gives reason for checking on it ... for the presence-absence in the actions Ivanov signs of crimes referred to in Articles 369, 391, 400 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus ", - says the chief district court judge Pershamaiski head of the investigative committee. A copy of the letter he sent the prosecutor of Vitebsk region Gennady Dysko.

Article 369 of the Penal Code (insulting a government official) provides for the maximum punishment of restriction of liberty for up to 2 years. The remaining articles, which, according to the chairman of the district court violated by Peter Ivanov: Article 391 - an insult to the judge (can be punishable by restraint of liberty for a term of up to 3 years), Article 400 - misleading information (threatening restriction of liberty for up to 2 years).

Recall, April 17, Mr. Ivanov was fined by the judge Kismeroshkinoy 40 basic units. Ivanov witnessed the detention of activists BCD Alexei Kischuk and Stanislav Lavrenov who conducted a rally in support of political prisoners and filed a complaint against the police officers who, according to him, making the detention of activists have broken the rules of the road. In his statement was filed the administrative case, but in the end the police are not punished, and Ivanova - for false testimony. And at the same time and for resisting law enforcement agencies, who detained him. The Court judge committed Kismeroshkina and witnesses in the case were ... policemen.

Now it seems that history may repeat itself, but with more serious consequences for Peter Ivanov. After all, it is not an administrative offense, and a criminal report.

"Criminals" - that is, in a statement to the Investigation Committee Vitebsk fighter for the truth, asking to bring them to justice, called the judge Kismeroshkina and those police officers who testified against him. However, according to the chairman of the district court, "criminal", perhaps, is Ivanov.

Moreover, the "offensive statements and statements to judges, prosecutors, police officers, their defamation in connection with the exercise of their official duties in accordance with their competence as defined by law, not only discredit the individual judges and government officials, but also on the whole undermine the authority of law enforcement and judicial authorities, show a sense of permissiveness and impunity with Ivanov that is unacceptable and should lead the response provided by the law, "- so says the chairman of the court of the chief of the Investigation Committee.

Thus, the investigation committee shall conduct the proceedings on two opposite statements: On the scales on the one hand a statement of Truth that the judge and the police - the criminals, the other - the statement of the Court that the said truth-seeker may have incriminated himself because the first and is the culprit.

You can guess how the case will turn. Still worth to wait with the forecast. It will all end - will know soon. To be continued...