Representatives of the prosecutor's office ignored the statements Vitebsk human rights activist Valery Misnikov on violations of the current legislation on the part of some officials. Law enforcement, citing a law on citizens and legal entities, announced Mr. Misnikov improperly left the applicant and his complaint without consideration, and the prosecutor's response.
For more than half a human rights activist is inconclusive conversation with the prosecutor of Vitebsk Yuri Romanov and the prosecutor of Vitebsk region Gennady Dysko. In repeated statements by Valery violations of legal requirements - not to provide information to applicants or deliberate distortion of its state bodies and organizations, and business leaders - the prosecutors did not respond adequately and have not carried out the necessary checks.
As a consequence, there was no protocol drafted on offenses against negligent officials (in cases where inspection revealed to such offenses) and not made any decision to refuse to initiate administrative cases (when the signal of the offense proved to be false).
Thus, officials of the Prosecutor's Office refused to prosecute the management of "Red October" for the fact that officials of the company illegally fired the young specialist, who had not managed to work out the due date for the distribution. The reason for his refusal to respond to reports of violation of the law guards explained that the applicant has not made a victim of a young specialist and human rights activist Misnikov.
The latter, in their statements and complaints to the prosecutor also repeatedly pointed to violations by police officers and judges the law "On mass events in Belarus" and international treaties in the sphere of freedom of peaceful assembly.
In particular, Misnikov cited the recent example of Vitebsk persecution of independent journalists when police major Alexander Rybakov, judges Denis Gubanov and Elena Tsygankova recognized photographing a group of people on a street in the city of an administrative offense. The police and the courts, defining photography as a public event, illegally, according to a human rights activist, journalist punished heavy fines.
In all these cases, prosecutors refused to consider allegations of violations of the law because of the lack of a human rights defender documents that would confirm his authority to represent the interests of citizens in government.
Based on a six-month correspondence with prosecutors, Valery Misnikov makes a simple but sad conclusion: "The belief that deception on the part of the authorities and prosecutors are opposed, and the power structure of the state is a naive mistake."
Vitebsk Spring