Chief of interdistrict department of Internal Affairs lieutenant colonel Viciebsk Oblast Executive Committee Alexander Stepanov, first issued "the decision to dismiss the case on administrative violation" of human rights defender Pavel Levinau, and after 9 days of this decision was replaced with a new one according to which Mr. Levinau found the offender.

The first ruling was handed down on September 21, 2015, the second born in the light of September 30th. Police Lieutenant Colonel admitted that he "described in part of a case", and imposed an administrative penalty Levinau to a fine of 90 000 rubles.

According to the decree, Paul Levinau as the owner of the vehicle must pay a fine for exceeding the speed of 14 km / h, which was recorded a year ago, October 13, 2014.

By Pavel Levinau:

– This is not the first of my confrontation with the Inspectorate. In 2009, the traffic police has deprived me of the right to drive vehicles. Local judges and prosecutors are violations of the traffic police have not seen. Only the Supreme Court to cancel the illegal ruling.

In 2012, the traffic police failed attempt to draw me as a pedestrian, to administrative responsibility for being on the carriageway.

As regards the latter case, twice to order the imposition of an administrative fine on me, and twice they were canceled.

At the time of fixing speeding car driven by a close relative. The Constitution gives me the right not to testify against family members. Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Stepanov was presented a witness who stated that the car October 13, 2014 was driven not by me.

Currently, the decision "to dismiss the case on an administrative offense", according to which I have been brought to administrative responsibility, appealed to the Court of Pervomaisky district of Viciebsk. The complaint I have on numerous irregularities in the conduct of administrative proceedings: violation of the right to appeal the actions of the person conducting the administrative process, self-elimination of that person from the establishment of the driver of the car at the time of the excess speed, violation of my right to participate in the proceedings and in the defense, the imposition of penalties at the expiration of the period of application and etc. I think the court will deliver in this matter and stop point in the administrative proceedings against me.

Vitebsk Spring