Human rights activist Valery Misnikov believes that everything that happened after the disappearance of his name from the list of members of the precinct commission №17 in Viciebsk can be regarded as a failure to act of the judiciary during the presidential election campaign. Prosecution officials deliberately withdrew from fulfilling their obligations under the state supervision of the electoral process.
From media reports it is known that at a meeting of the administration of Pervomaisky district of Viciebsk on August 26 for inclusion in the precinct commission №17 civic activist Valery Misnikov nominated by Pervomaysky district organization of the Republican Party of Labor and Justice, all present voted unanimously. The fact was recorded by Paul Levinau human rights activist, who was present at the meeting as an observer of the public association "Belarusian Helsinki Committee" (BHC), as well as party members Valery Misnikov Ivan Peletskim - a member of the political executive of the Viciebsk city party organization.
As he says Valery, he was included in the draft decision and the draft was voted unanimously. That is, all the procedures provided by the legislation are fully complied with. And then a funny thing happened: after a decision by the executive committee meeting was over, but at the technical stage of printing of the list of members of the precinct commission his name vanished from the list in an unknown direction.
Despite the incident, Misnikov does not dispute the work of officials of the district administration, but has a couple of questions: "Who personally ruled me out of the members of the precinct commission? And by virtue of a statutory procedure that happen? "
These same questions were asked human rights activist Valery Misnikov - first orally - head of the department of organizational and personnel work of the regional administration L. Klimenchenko, and then - in a written statement - to the address of the city prosecutor's office. The official of the district administration to explain intelligibly what happened could not. We could not explain this fact and representatives of the city prosecutor's office. Moreover, within the statutory period a written reply from the prosecution on his statement Vitsebsk human rights activist and has not received. And this despite the provision of the necessary to clarify the motives of the incident information and details about witnesses.
Not waiting for an answer, September 10 Valery Misnikov is an appointment with a member of a specially created committee in the city prosecutor's office to work with the legal issues that arise during the election period.
About what happened next, says Mr Misnikov:
"We have sent you an answer," - he said to me to show me to the prosecutor's office claims the official, accept me. - I said, "there was no answer." We start to talk to him. I explain to him that I was interested in only two made me question. But he stubbornly refuses to hear me and perceive. I told him: "You are inadequate, you are not able to understand the exact meaning of my conversion." - He offended me. - I told him: "You are with me, of course, may be offended, but you are inadequate. You do not think is reasonable. " - But he still continues to ask some strange questions: "What you have put forward the party? And how did it happen? "-" I do not care, it's technical issues the party, I do not dispute. You tell me: Why is my name disappeared from the list, and who is to blame? "- He says," I'm calling the police. " - "Call." - Part of the policeman on duty who explains to me that the prosecutor's official - a man of understanding, because the commission is held annually. - "Maybe at this stage he is reasonable, but agree with me that if the prosecutor, held annually commission does not know the legal term" insulting ", what is it then the prosecutor? And what is it then reasonable Attorney? I'm not talking about some of his human quality, I give an assessment of his professional activity. " - They tupike.- "What do we do?" - Asks the prosecutor a policeman. - There is a pause. Then the policeman says, "let him go with God."
But before you go to the prosecutor, I made a note in the book of comments and suggestions, which asked the prosecutor not to delay consideration of my appeal, as the presidential election campaign will be over soon, and after 11 October, I was no prosecutorial decisions are not needed and are not interested.
And, imagine, just three days later, on Monday, they give me an answer to my remark in the book of comments. Yuri Romanovsky writes that the 09/09/2015, the city prosecutor's office sent me the answer that I have the right to appeal. But there is no answer, I did not get and never seen! What is it? The game in the children's sandbox? Oh, "mail guilty" ?!
On the same day, September 14, I give a complaint to the regional prosecutor's office in the name of Gennady Dysko and ask him to constrained city prosecutor's office to respond to my appeal and restore my rights violated. But there is no response from the regional prosecutor's office to this day I have not received!
Now let's analyze what happened: 9 days, city prosecutor's office reportedly considered my statement, but neither BHC observer Paul Levine, no other witnesses claimed me, has not been questioned. Do not questioned, did nothing and did not send a response. They reply sent. But while they considered my statement, if it is not checked, if not interviewed the witnesses? We decided to play? And it is - the authorities!
It turns out that the human rights activist Misnikov not worthy to be a part of the district commission?
I do not know what they were guided. And this despite the fact that my social activities and professional skills are high enough. If I exclude the people they then include? So, to include, for some standards, but these standards for some reason they never prescribed. What if they take my time and health? I do not deserve it, especially because I live in a "unitary, democratic, social state of law." If someone wants to argue, even argue with Article 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus.
Maybe they are afraid that citizen V. Misnikov see something that does not need to see anyone except members of the commission, the main criterion for activity is unconditional and perform "ukazivkas" emanating from higher officials?
I alarming fact: why civil society activists who would like to participate in this political event, deprived of such elementary opportunities? Thus, my legitimate right not recovered to this day. Because I want to make a legal disability, a person with limited legal capacity. In addition, the deliberate omission of prosecutorial officials intended to limit the legal and political opportunities offered by the state to the citizen in the process of self-realization of the campaign. And it is - nothing more than a discrimination!
In recent years, more and more often confronted with reigning in the country lawlessness, sometimes I think that the government took some humanoid creature that looks absolutely indistinguishable from Homo sapiens, but it is absolutely not appropriate to the level of his intellectual and moral qualities. However, if you work there humanoids, but intelligence does not reach the level of a reasonable person, but only the appropriate level of Homo erectus - Homo habilis, then what? Moral and legal mutants seized power!
And if we do not make public place in violation of the legal country, these mutants distort the essence of the legal system, for the professionalism they do not peculiar, but their instincts are directed only at the elementary self-preservation and self-survival animal.
Vitebsk Spring
